MARCH: CBD JELLY BEANS, LEONARDO DOES A HOUDINI, RALPH IS NOT WITH LAUREN AND MORE!
FOOD
The Creator Of Jelly Belly Released A Line Of CBD-Infused Jelly Beans
Content Courtesy of: delish.com
Written by: MAYA MCDOWELL
Regular jelly beans are a fun, fruity treat, but how about CBD-infused ones? David Klein, the genius behind Jelly Belly jelly beans, has given the chewy candy a 2019 makeover with Spectrum Confections—a line of jelly beans infused with cannabidol (CBD). Now these are some jelly beans I'd want to find in an Easter egg!
Klein sold his rights to Jelly Belly in 1980, according to Cannabis Aficionado, but candy has still been on his mind. After recently realizing the benefits of CBD, he asked himself "is anybody doing a jelly bean with CBD?" he told the outlet. He couldn't find any, and he saw an opportunity to create candy again that could help people.
Spectrum Confections, Klein's company, produces CBD-infused jelly beans in 38 different flavors. He says that strawberry cheesecake is one of his favorites and other flavors include toasted marshmallow, piña colada, cinnamon, spicy licorice, and mango. According to the website, each jelly bean has 10 mg of CBD and is sanded with dextrose to mask the CBD flavor.
The beans come in sugar-free and sour varieties, too. Klein is definitely onto something here, because the CBD jelly beans are currently out of stock. The website says to use the contact form or email the company for information on where to buy the Spectrum Jelly Beans.
In a reply to a comment on Facebook, Spectrum Confections wrote, "we are the manufacturer and only sell bulk units to distributors. We are seeing our vendors sell for approximately $2.00 per jelly bean with 10mg." So, keep your eyes peeled for the CBD jelly beans!
We reached out to the company for more information regarding availability and when the jelly beans may be back in stock online. We will update as we hear back.
ART
A Leonardo Made a $450 Million Splash. Now There’s No Sign of It.
Content Courtesy of: nytimes.com
Written by: David D. Kirkpatrick
ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates — The Louvre Abu Dhabi might seem to have all you could ask for in a world-class museum. Its acclaimed design shades its galleries under a vast dome that appears to hover over the waters of the Persian Gulf. Inside are works by Rembrandt and Vermeer, Monet and van Gogh, Mondrian and Basquiat.
Yet the work that the Louvre Abu Dhabi once promised would anchor its collection is conspicuously absent: “Salvator Mundi,” a painting of Jesus Christ attributed to Leonardo da Vinci.
Few works have evoked as much intrigue, either in the world of art or among the courts of Persian Gulf royals. First, its authenticity as the product of Leonardo’s own hand was the subject of intense debate. Then, in November 2017, it became the most expensive work ever sold at auction, fetching $450.3 million from an anonymous bidder who turned out to be a close ally and possible stand-in for the ruler of Saudi Arabia, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
Now, the painting is shrouded in a new mystery: Where in the world is “Salvator Mundi”?
Although the Abu Dhabi culture department announced about a month after the auction that it had somehow acquired “Salvator Mundi” for display in the local Louvre, a scheduled unveiling of the painting last September was canceled without explanation. The culture department is refusing to answer questions. Staff of the Louvre Abu Dhabi say privately that they have no knowledge of the painting’s whereabouts.
New York Art Galleries: What to See Right Now
Gilles Aillaud’s portraits of zoo animals; Paul Mpagi Sepuya’s homoerotic photographs; Christina Forrer’s paintings on a loom; and the BRIC Biennial’s third South Brooklyn Edition.
Gilles Aillaud
Through May 11. Ortuzar Projects, 9 White Street, Manhattan; 212-257-0033, ortuzarprojects.com.For decades, American art students have learned that the years around 1968 saw the triumph of conceptual art, process-based sculpture, environmental interventions and body-oriented performances — and only now, at half a century’s distance, are we admitting that figurative painting had its place too in the late-60s art world, especially in Western Europe. Gilles Aillaud (1928-2005) was a central actor of Narrative Figuration during Paris’s years of student revolt, as well as a set designer at Europe’s top avant-garde theaters. But “Paintings 1964-1976,” with eight coolly composed portraits of animals in zoos, is the first showcase of his works in New York since a show at Gladstone Gallery in 1982.
Aillaud and two other young painters stormed to scandalous prominence in 1965 with the collective series “Live and Let Die, or the Tragic Death of Marcel Duchamp,” which pictured the young French artists assassinating the father figure of the avant-garde. (They were also, by symbolically murdering a Frenchman who’d become an American citizen, spitting on contemporary Parisian envy of the New York School.) By 1967 Aillaud had turned to zoos, and before and after the student uprising he painted tortoises, rhinos, porcupines and pythons under heat lamps or beside industrial pipes. In a bare blue cage we see two soporific lions, their eyes vacant, their fur painted with aloof strokes of white. Two hippopotamuses, their thick skin evenly rendered in bronze and burnt umber, float in an aquarium like corpses. The animals never do anything in these zoo paintings. They don’t even meet our gaze; they just laze about on concrete and cinder blocks. It is a stifled view, conversant with the 19th-century tradition of animalier painting, but stripped of any allegorical comfort.
Back in left-wing Paris 50 years ago, Aillaud’s silent, unconsoling art appeared as the antithesis of gestural American abstraction, offering the most alienated view of an industrial capitalist society. They may be more moving today, in an era of climate emergency, when no distinction holds between the natural the man-made. JASON FARAGO